Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solar Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Northampton County adopts Solar Energy Development Ordinance with limits and higher fines after public comment
Summary
Following public hearings and resident testimony, the Board adopted a county Solar Energy Development Ordinance on June 23 with amendments limiting utility-scale solar density, increasing daily fines for violations and adding citizen seats to a benefits committee.
Get email alerts on the Solar Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
After multiple presentations and public comment sessions, the Northampton County Board of Commissioners adopted a Solar Energy Development Ordinance on June 23. The ordinance was approved with three specific amendments adopted during the meeting: (1) an Appendix B cap on maximum county utility-scale solar density set at 2.5% of Northampton County's total acreage; (2) an increase in Appendix E to set daily fines for violations at $10,000 per day (up from $100 in the draft); and (3) addition in Appendix F of one citizen from each county district to the Economic Development Community Benefits Committee.
The Board received a background presentation on solar fundamentals and a draft ordinance in prior meetings and held a public hearing on June 23. Multiple residents and community groups raised concerns during the hearing and at earlier meetings about siting, community impacts and complaint processes; speakers recorded in the minutes included Sylvia Vincent, Debbie Davis, Tim Hollowell and Alfred Kwasikpui. Commissioners discussed density limits, enforcement and citizen participation before voting.
The adopted ordinance includes permitting standards, performance requirements, community benefits language and enforcement provisions. County staff will publish the ordinance text and implement permitting protocols through the Planning Department. The minutes record that the Planning Board provided a favorable recommendation with requested amendments in May.
Supporters at earlier meetings had pointed to economic and renewable-energy benefits, while opponents emphasized community impacts and sought stronger enforcement and citizen representation. The Board's adopted amendments addressed several of those concerns by tightening density and enforcement measures and expanding the citizens' role on the benefits committee.
