Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Increment Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fergus Falls council debates limits for TIF, splits over housing exceptions
Summary
At a Fergus Falls City Council meeting, members reviewed a draft tax-increment financing (TIF) policy. Councilors signaled support for retaining an 8-year cap on economic-development TIFs but were split on housing (proposals ranged from 12 to 15 years or none); staff will revise the draft to reflect the discussion.
Mayor Hicks opened the discussion by outlining the city's TIF record: "In total, there's been, 45 projects, 6 of which are currently open," he said, adding that 37 have been decertified and returned to the tax rolls and that two were never certified (one apartment project on the Shopko parking lot will not move forward).
City staff told councilors that statute sets maximum durations for common district types: economic development up to eight years, housing up to 25 years and redevelopment up to 25 years. "Economic development TIF ... is typically ... manufacturing, warehousing, R and D facilities," a staff member said while explaining how redevelopment TIF targets blight and gave the Mill Hotel and the former Checkers site as recent redevelopment examples.
The bulk of the meeting focused on whether to embed specific time limits and other rules in a written TIF policy. Council members largely agreed to keep economic-development TIFs at the eight-year statutory maximum, but housing prompted sharp division. One councilor said, "I'm not a big supporter of housing for TIF," arguing that housing projects often do not generate additional sales tax and may not benefit the whole community. Another member urged flexibility, saying that large projects sometimes need longer timelines because of their high upfront costs.
Several council members proposed a default limit for housing shorter than the 25-year statutory maximum. Suggestions included a 12-year default that could be extended on a case-by-case basis, references to nearby Alexandria's 13-year practice, and a starting proposal of 15 years. A council member summarized the tradeoff: a lower fixed cap could limit the city's negotiating leverage and scare off projects, while a higher cap increases taxpayer exposure.
Staff noted procedural checks and common mechanics: a five-year rule typically requires developers to meet benchmarks or risk losing TIF eligibility, and the statutory clock runs from the first receipt of increment, not district creation. City staff also said the city uses Baker Tilly as its municipal advisor and that the firm's cost analyses often explain why some projects seek longer terms.
On program details, the council discussed administrative charges and underwriting safeguards. The draft policy included a $2,000 application fee and a $15,000 escrow deposit; councilors debated raising those figures to $3,000 and $20,000 to better cover professional and legal costs. The council also discussed requiring developer equity and settled on a 20% equity expectation in principle. Members debated whether housing TIF should be nontransferable (terminating on sale); supporters of that restriction said it limits speculative transfers, while others said nontransferability could deter investment.
Councilors also weighed policy philosophy: whether TIF should primarily be an economic-development incentive to attract jobs or a gap-financing tool that fills shortfalls on housing projects. Staff pointed out that TIF can be used in one district to front infrastructure costs that benefit housing in another district.
No formal votes were taken at the meeting. Instead, councilors asked staff to incorporate the feedback into the draft policy. Mayor Hicks closed by asking staff to prepare edits and return a revised draft for future action.
The council discussion affects developers, renters and taxpayers: drafting a clear TIF checklist and default limits aims to give the city's economic-development staff guidance and predictable expectations for applicants.
