Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transit Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

CityLink budget projects $4.8M; council questions paratransit cost growth and $2M general‑fund transfer

Edmond City Council · April 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

CityLink staff proposed a roughly $4.8 million FY27 budget, highlighted growing paratransit demand and reliance on grants and transfers; council asked for benchmarks, per‑ride subsidy calculations and options to reduce the city transfer while preserving essential service.

CityLink’s director, Christy Batterson, presented a proposed FY27 budget of about $4.8 million and walked the council through service history, ridership trends and funding sources. Batterson said CityLink is a fare‑free system and that the operation is a subrecipient in the regional FTA funding process; staff expects about $1.1 million in Section 5307 federal formula funding and roughly $2 million in general‑fund transfers to subsidize operations.

Batterson highlighted paratransit growth: paratransit rides have risen from roughly 3,000 at startup to a projected ~20,000 this year. She said paratransit is the most expensive mode to operate and that vehicles are reaching end of life, requiring capital replacements. The operating contract with RATPDev USA uses revenue hours as the pricing basis.

Council members ran preliminary subsidy calculations during the workshop. One calculation noted a $32 per‑ride subsidy if outside funding were removed; the mayor later corrected an annualization error and said an “all‑in” figure showed about $30.85 per ride and that the city’s direct contribution (excluding other revenues) is about $16.45 per ride under a different accounting frame. Batterson agreed comparative benchmarks vary across peer cities and said she would supply per‑ride and revenue‑hour comparisons.

Council discussed options to lower the transfer requirement — for example, reducing Route 6 to a single bus (estimated savings about $180,000) or reducing frequency on selected routes — and flagged the risk that reducing the city match would lower grant competitiveness. Staff noted CityLink used CARES and ARPA reserves during the pandemic and that reserves were drawn this year to cover costs.

Council did not adopt changes at the workshop; they asked staff for comparative cost-per-ride data, clearer reserve accounting, and options that balance service levels with a sustainable subsidy.