Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Setback topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning and zoning panel approves home carport that encroaches on side setback
Summary
Commissioners approved a conditional use permit to allow a resident to install a 15-by-20-foot carport on the east side of her home that would encroach on the standard side setback after staff measurements and neighbor correspondence indicated the structure would remain on the property.
At the planning and zoning meeting, commissioners approved a conditional use permit allowing a resident to install a 15-by-20-foot carport on the east side of her house that would encroach into the standard side setback.
The applicant, identified in the hearing as a resident, told the panel, "I'm proposing to put a carport on the east side, east kind of southeast," explaining the structure is intended to protect vehicles from leaves and birds. Commissioners and staff reviewed site drawings and mapping measurements and heard from staff that neighbors on the east had indicated no objections.
Commission staff and a member who identified herself as Mrs. Topham reviewed applicable zoning setbacks, noting the zoning guidance in the packet showed a 20-foot front setback, a 5-foot rear setback and an 8-foot side setback. Using the meeting mapping tool, staff reported an approximate measurement of "11.71 feet from the corner of your shed" to the property line, and commissioners confirmed the proposed 15-by-20-foot, open-sided carport placed on the gravel would remain on the applicant's lot. An applicant-stated contractor recommendation and staff measurement informed the discussion on whether a formal numeric setback should be recorded in the approval.
The chair moved to grant the requested setback/conditional use permit to allow the carport; the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote. The commission directed staff to prepare the approval paperwork; staff said the city manager would sign the form and the applicant could pick up the signed document afterwards.
During discussion, staff clarified enforcement is typically complaint-driven: "our code enforcement is typically ran off of complaints," a staff member said, adding that staff would investigate any neighbor complaint if one were filed. Commissioners also noted the commission has discretionary authority under code to allow reduced setbacks if warranted.
The commission closed the item and later adjourned the meeting. No formal building-permit determination was recorded during the discussion; staff and the applicant discussed that some movable structures may not require county building permits but that the applicant should confirm building-permit requirements separately.
