Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Crypto Valuation Audits topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Presenter urges Merkle‑tree audits and fair‑value benchmark for seized and unclaimed crypto

Blockchain Digital Innovation Task Force · April 23, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

John Gotts told Montana legislators the state needs a standardized 'digital gold' fair‑value formula and real‑time exchange transparency (Merkle‑tree audits) so treasurers can reliably value inherited or seized crypto holdings.

John Gotts, founder of the Digital Gold Foundation, told the Blockchain Digital Innovation Task Force that states should adopt a consistent measure to value layer‑1 cryptocurrencies and push exchanges for verifiable transparency.

"So the things that we need are, we need a formula for fair value, which Senate Bill 1649 lays out, digital gold standard benchmark, that anchor," Gotts said, describing a model that weights adoption (he estimated adoption accounts for roughly 70% of Bitcoin’s value), transaction volume and developer ecosystem to arrive at a fair price.

Gotts also urged mandatory exchange audits and public Merkle‑tree data so regulators and treasurers can check how many distinct holders and real users an exchange serves rather than relying on unaudited volume figures. "Give us a real time audit so people can actually see at the end of every day how many actual transactions of each coin an exchange actually do," he said.

Why it matters: Gotts framed the proposals as operational tools for public finance — when a state receives digital assets from seizures or unclaimed property, officials must decide whether to hold or liquidate. Without a defensible valuation benchmark and verifiable adoption data, treasurers face uncertainty about long‑term custody versus immediate liquidation.

Task force members asked about implementation and data availability; several said they would probe Arizona’s SB 1649 and similar bills. Gotts suggested that one state requiring Merkle‑tree disclosure could prompt wider industry compliance.

Next steps: task force staff will request copies of the Arizona draft and related proposals and include the Merkle‑tree/audit concept in a list of legislative options.