Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Clackamas commissioners approve multiple grants, contracts and project agreements
Loading...
Summary
The board approved a wide consent agenda including grant applications and contract amendments across housing, public health, public safety and transportation, with funding coming from state, Metro, and other program sources; no county general funds were cited for these items.
Clackamas County commissioners approved a broad consent agenda on April 23 that included grants, contract amendments and intergovernmental agreements across multiple departments.
Key items approved included amendments to personal-services contracts for housing authority program participants: Impact Northwest ($300,000 amendment; new total $1,388,347.26) and Mental Health and Addiction Association doing business as The Peer Company ($120,000 amendment; new total $457,318.92), both funded through Metro Supportive Housing Services measure funding. The board also approved a grant agreement with the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission for behavioral health clinician services ($1,177,724 over two years) and an assessor funding assistance grant application (approximately $1,242,000 for FY 2026–27) to be submitted to the state.
Other approved items included a renewal with Executive Information Services Inc. for geomanagement software ($107,204 amendment), an intergovernmental reimbursement agreement with the City of Lake Oswego for retail crime investigation expenses ($23,000), and transportation-related intergovernmental agreements including a TriMet agreement for design and construction of the 82nd Avenue transit project. Additional items touching public health, early learning hub enrollment, homelessness rehousing funds and language interpretation services were also approved, with funding sources identified as state agencies, Metro, or program-specific levies.
Commissioner West moved approval of the consent agenda and Commissioner Helm seconded; the motion passed 4-0. Commissioners noted multiple items had no county general-fund impact as presented in the packet.
