Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Early Learning Center Traffic topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Silver Hill mayor warns proposed early learning center would push hundreds of cars onto town streets
Summary
At the April 21 Baldwin County Public Schools meeting, Silver Hill Mayor Lyle told the board no traffic study had been done for the proposed early learning center site and argued on-site queuing would be insufficient — he estimated roughly 500 daily parent drop-offs with only 64 on-site queuing spaces, potentially pushing about 436 cars onto local streets and creating emergency-access risks.
At the April 21 Baldwin County Public Schools board meeting, Silver Hill Mayor Lyle told trustees the district’s proposed early learning center site lacks a traffic plan and warned it would force hundreds of parent drop-off vehicles onto the town’s narrow streets.
Mayor Lyle said he repeatedly asked for the site traffic study after the board’s prior meeting and — after weeks of requests — was told by the project architect that no traffic study had been completed. Using a working enrollment estimate of 600 students (he said he had heard higher numbers, up to 750), the mayor argued the site would generate as many as 500 parent vehicles a day when buses are not permitted for pre-K. “A very generous estimate would be 500 cars coming through that line every day,” he said, and added that only 64 cars can queue on the property as currently drawn, leaving roughly 436 cars to queue on public streets.
The mayor calculated that at 22 feet per car, the on-street waiting line would total about 9,592 feet — roughly 1.82 miles — and observed that the town of Silver Hill is about one square mile. He warned that the likely backups on 7th, 8th and 9th Streets would block driveways and could prevent emergency vehicles from reaching residents during an incident.
Lyle said the town is not opposed to the school but is opposed to the site as currently planned without a traffic mitigation plan. He told the board the town had suggested alternatives and that local officials are willing to work with the district to find a safer solution.
A board member thanked the mayor for the detailed presentation and said the information provided the level of fidelity the district had not yet seen. Superintendent staff and other board members acknowledged they were working on the issue and said they had not brought a vote that night on the early learning center; more discussion was expected at a future work session.
The board did not vote on the early learning center site at the April 21 meeting. The mayor’s request frames a near-term decision point for the board: either supply a traffic study and on-site mitigation plan or reconsider the site location before moving forward.
