Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Holyoke council approves home-rule petition to change financial appointment authority; treasurer vote is tabled
Loading...
Summary
The council voted 9–2 to send a home-rule petition changing the city charterappointing authority for financial offices to the state legislature, while debate over appointing a treasurer under the current charter fractured and the immediate appointment was tabled.
The Holyoke City Council voted to send a home-rule petition to the Massachusetts Legislature that would amend the city charter’s language governing appointing authority for certain financial offices, a change supporters said will align local administration with the Municipal Modernization Act. The motion to recommend the petition was approved by roll call, 9 ayes to 2 nays.
The petition, considered under item 42, eliminates outdated 1897-era language and clarifies that some appointment confirmations will be set by ordinance rather than fixed charter text. Councilor Panitch urged colleagues to move forward, saying the change would facilitate the citys planned reorganization of financial offices. “We have gone over this carefully,” Panitch said as the council reviewed two legal versions of the petition.
Councilor Bacon delivered a minority report urging caution and asking the council to complete an internal appointment first. Bacon said the council currently retains the legal authority to appoint a treasurer and that, if a qualified candidate already exists, the council should proceed in a way that honors voters and the charter. “I implore this body to do its work as the elected representatives,” Bacon said, asking colleagues to consider taking related item 63 up in tandem.
City Solicitor Bissonnette advised the council that placing the petition with the Legislature is lawful and routine under the Home Rule process, but he also cautioned about timing and technicalities; another city lawyer warned that attempting to elect a treasurer without adequate notice could raise open-meeting-law concerns.
The meeting also included an extended exchange on item 63, a separate order proposing the council go to the first ballot to elect a treasurer at the April 21 meeting. That motion failed when the council declined to move to the first ballot. Bacon then offered an amendment to make any appointment effective June 1, 2026, to allow training and administrative transitions; after further debate the amended motion was tabled for a later meeting.
The home-rule petition will be forwarded to Boston for legislative consideration; any charter change would not take effect until the Legislature and governor act. The councils action leaves the sequence of internal appointments and the practical timing of an eventual treasurer appointment unresolved, with staff and the administration continuing to coordinate a transition and training schedule.
