Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House gives third reading to animal-cruelty penalties bill as members decry lack of hate-crime law
Summary
The South Carolina House gave third reading to House Bill 30-34, a measure increasing penalties for animal abuse, during floor debate in which several members linked the bill to broader calls for a state hate-crime law and aired divergent views on amendments that were not adopted.
The South Carolina House on the floor considered House Bill 30-34, a measure tightening penalties for animal abuse, and gave the bill a third reading after extended floor remarks that brought the state's absence of a standalone hate-crime law into the debate. Representative McDaniel said she voted against the bill because an amendment to attach hate-crime protections for people had been declined.
"I voted against this bill because there was an amendment so that any hate crimes that are done against anyone, particularly and including human beings, also would be attached to this bill," Representative McDaniel said, arguing the Legislature has not done enough to protect victims of bias-motivated crimes. She told constituents she opposed the bill in its current form to signal that priority.
Other members rejected the notion that protecting animals and people were mutually exclusive. Representative Gilliard urged passage while pressing colleagues to act on broader hate-crime legislation: "South Carolina is only one of two states without a hate crime law," he said, calling for action and describing the issue as urgent. Representative Jermaine Johnson, a cosponsor of the animal-abuse bill, framed his support around a general principle of valuing life and inclusion: "I believe in valuing all life," he said.
Floor decorum required the Speaker to bring members back to the bill at times while discussion ranged into larger policy concerns. The measure received third reading on the floor; the clerk announced the bill "receives third reading." The House then moved on to other calendar business.
The debate left unresolved calls for a separate hate-crime statute: several members urged lawmakers to take that up as distinct legislation, but the floor record shows no adopted amendment attaching hate-crime provisions to House Bill 30-34. The House gave the bill third reading; the transcript does not record the bill's subsequent referral or final enrollment step.
