Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lindenhurst board adopts Grand Avenue streetscape and design guidelines

Village of Lindenhurst Village Board · April 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Lindenhurst Village Board unanimously adopted the Grand Avenue Corridor Streetscape and Design Guidelines, a planning document from Teska Associates that includes conceptual renderings, public input and cost estimates; design and construction proposals will be presented later.

The Lindenhurst Village Board voted May 12 to adopt the Grand Avenue Corridor Streetscape and Design Guidelines, a planning document prepared by Teska Associates that lays out recommended redevelopment scenarios, conceptual renderings and a detailed cost estimate for design and construction.

Trustee Ron Grace moved to adopt the plan and Trustee Dawn Suchy seconded; the board approved the measure by a 6–0 roll-call vote. The guidelines reflect input from a stakeholder steering committee and public open houses held Jan. 27 and Feb. 24, 2025, and include illustrative renderings intended to show how redevelopment might look under different scenarios.

Mayor Dominic Marturano and staff said the document is intended as a design framework; specific design and implementation proposals will be brought to the board for consideration after additional engineering and funding work. The guidelines include estimated costs for recommended improvements, but no construction contracts were approved at the meeting.

The adoption positions the village to pursue future streetscape projects and to provide a consistent set of recommendations for developers and stakeholders. Trustees who supported the measure emphasized the public engagement that informed the plan. The board did not vote on funding or construction timelines at the meeting; those items will require separate approvals.