Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council adopts ordinance adding general public‑comment portion to regular meetings

Cache County Council · April 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council approved Ordinance 2026‑24 to add a general public comment period after approval of minutes, with the chair authorized to state conduct rules and time limits; supporters said it increases access, opponents warned it may be unproductive under the Open and Public Meetings Act.

A presenter (speaker 11) introduced Ordinance 2026‑24 to amend the county council meeting procedures (Title 2.12) by adding a general public comment portion after approval of minutes. The draft states the purpose of public comment is to allow interested members of the public to address matters germane to county government that are not already scheduled for a dedicated public hearing.

Under the proposal the chair would announce conduct rules at the start of the public comment portion, including reasonable time limits, a requirement to submit written materials with copies for council and clerk, and other rules necessary for orderly operation. The ordinance would allow public comment on matters related to county operations or council business that are not already scheduled for a public hearing.

Council debate was divided. Supporters (including speaker 8 and speaker 7) said a standing public‑comment item would make the council more accessible and provide a public forum for concerns. One supporter suggested a rigid structure (15 minutes total, two minutes per person) to keep the item manageable. Opponents (speaker 3) noted that under the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, council members cannot discuss or respond substantively during public comment, which may make the addition unproductive unless carefully structured.

A motion to suspend rules and approve the amendment for a six‑month trial passed after discussion; at least one member (speaker 4) voted nay. The ordinance will take effect per county process and is subject to reevaluation after the trial period.