Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission forwards parking restrictions for front-yard vehicle parking to council
Summary
Tooele City staff proposed an amendment to Tooele City Code 7-4-7 to prohibit operable vehicles from parking in front yards and restrict side‑yard parking to defined areas; commissioners recommended the change 7–0 after discussing paving definitions, enforcement, and groundwater concerns.
The Tooele City Planning Commission on Wednesday voted 7–0 to recommend that the city council consider ordinance amendments limiting parking of operable motor vehicles in front yards and specifying permitted side-yard parking in residential zones.
City staff member Agard told the commission the amendment — developed at the direction of the city council and refined in several council work sessions — would limit vehicle parking to established driveways, garages/carports, the side yard adjacent to a driveway, and rear yards. Staff also proposed a figure to appear in the ordinance illustrating permitted parking areas. Paragraph D in the proposed text would require front-, side- and rear-yard parking areas to be paved with concrete, asphalt, gravel, pavers or another similar paving method; paragraph E would prohibit parking in the front yard area between the inside edge of the driveway and the front corner of the residential structure.
Commissioners focused much of their discussion on the ordinance language around "paved" versus gravel, enforcement practicality and cost, groundwater concerns, and how the city would address long‑term violations. "I just don't like the way we're using that word 'paved,' although technically correct," Commissioner Anderson said, raising a concern that some residents would interpret paving as concrete only. Agard responded that gravel was included deliberately to reduce the cost burden on homeowners who cannot afford concrete or asphalt, but acknowledged the code lacks construction specifications for gravel depth or installation method and that enforcement is complaint-driven and can be slow.
Chairman Hamilton opened the required public hearing; no members of the public spoke. Commissioner Jensen moved to forward a positive recommendation to the city council to adopt the proposed text amendment (including figure 7‑4‑7); Commissioner Proctor seconded. The commission voted 7–0 to forward the item for council consideration.
Staff noted enforcement would rely on the city attorney for warrants and city‑contracted tow companies if owners do not comply; staff also said showing up with a tow truck often prompts voluntary compliance before legal action is needed. Next steps are a city council hearing and additional review of ordinance language and any construction standards the council may require.
