Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Montana court hears argument over whether lumber buyer can be liable for loader’s injury
Summary
In oral argument in DA25-0409, attorneys debated whether Pacific Western Lumber (Pac West) owed a duty that would make it liable for injuries to an independent trucker who was hurt while log bundles were loaded at Clark Fork Post; the bench focused on foreseeability, the nature of purchase orders versus service contracts, and the Beckman exceptions for inherently dangerous activities.
The Montana court heard oral argument in DA25-0409 on whether Pacific Western Lumber Inc. can be held liable for injuries sustained by a contract trucker, Steve Blanchard, while log bundles were loaded at Clark Fork Post.
Appellants’ counsel told the justices that the case turns on two negligence theories: direct negligence, which depends on foreseeability of harm, and vicarious liability based on the inherently dangerous nature of the loading activity. The attorney argued Pac West knew or should have known that Clark Fork’s yard lacked industry-standard precautions—cherry-picker cranes and steel dunnage—and that sending Blanchard into that environment made injury reasonably foreseeable. “That loading is part…that is the inherently dangerous activity. That’s what caused the injury here,” counsel told the court, emphasizing evidence that the…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

