Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get AI Briefings, Transcripts & Alerts on Local & National Government Meetings — Forever.

Clark County approves coroner pay increase, reassigns deputy duties after resignation

Clark County Fiscal Court · April 24, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During the April 23 fiscal court meeting, the coroner requested a raise from about $29,001 to $40,000 effective Jan. 2027; the court approved setting the higher salary and authorized temporary redistribution of duties after one deputy resigned.

The Clark County fiscal court approved a change to the coroner’s pay and a temporary reassignment of deputy duties at its April 23 meeting.

The coroner, speaking during department-head comments, said the office has improved response times and asked the court for “a fair raise,” describing current pay as roughly $29,001 and requesting an increase to $40,000 a year taking effect in January 2027. The coroner said the immediate budget impact would be modest — “about $5,000” in the current fiscal year — and said the office has reduced scene response times and operated under budget.

Committee member (Speaker 3) moved to set the coroner’s salary for next year as requested; the motion was seconded and carried by voice vote. The court’s approval set the larger annual salary for the coroner to take effect next year and included a small one-time fiscal-year impact that the court said could be accommodated.

Separately, the court addressed a resignation by one of three deputy quarter positions. The chief deputy and the remaining deputy told the coroner they would cover the extra calls, with an agreed 60/40 split of the additional workload and associated temporary compensation. Court members clarified the current allocation for the position is $26,700 and said they would keep the allocation in the next year’s budget, while making temporary adjustments within available funds.

A magistrate and other members asked staff about funding sources; several noted available funds in the LGBA road/maintenance account that might accommodate short-term increases. The court did not identify a separate permanent hiring action for the vacant post at the meeting.

The court concluded the personnel and pay actions by voice vote and moved on to the remaining agenda items.