Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Palo Alto school board urges immediate safety steps after student death, backs temporary Churchill Crossing closure
Summary
After a student died on the Caltrain tracks, trustees—joined by students and families—directed staff to pursue temporary closure of the Churchill Crossing, explore shared funding for crossing guards, and expand mental-health supports, while the community pressed for faster, concrete measures.
Get email alerts on the Student Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Palo Alto Unified School District board on Feb. 10 responded to a recent student death by directing staff to pursue immediate, practical safety steps and to prioritize mental-health supports for students.
Board members and the superintendent described the loss as unacceptable and urged action to reduce access to lethal means near campus. Board President said the district stands with LGBTQ students and that “every student has a right to be who they are, fully, authentically, unapologetically” and pledged the board’s support for measures to keep students safe.
Superintendent Dr. Austin told the board he was working with the city and law enforcement on options including the temporary closure of the Churchill Crossing near campus and reinstating a track‑watch program. “I’m absolutely not backing away from the proposal and advocacy for closing Churchill,” he said, urging the city to consider physical or operational changes that reduce easy access to the tracks.
Students and family members urged immediate action. A student board representative, Ash, said the community must move beyond statements to concrete help and called for “true health, mental-health supports” and local prevention measures. Multiple public commenters—students, teachers, parents and the family of the student who died—asked the board to fund crossing guards, pursue temporary closures and increase visible, confidential access to counseling.
Trustees voiced a range of procedural and practical concerns but reached a common, immediate outcome: staff will work with city partners on measures to reduce access at the Churchill Crossing, and trustees asked the superintendent to begin operational steps to unwind recent staffing realignments that had reduced student support services while the board reviews the budget implications.
Board members emphasized the limits of local authority over rail infrastructure but said they would pursue both short‑term means‑reduction (temporary closures or barriers, crossing guards) and longer‑term changes. The board requested that possible shared funding with the city be explored so crossing guards could be deployed quickly.
The meeting included extended public testimony about the emotional toll on students and recommendations for on-campus changes such as a confidential sign‑out system to access wellness centers, additional orientation and peer‑based outreach, and more visible postvention supports after a death. Trustees said they would bring further concrete proposals back to the board and cooperate with city leaders.
The board moved into closed session to address remaining matters after a broad open‑forum period in which community members pressed for faster action. The superintendent said staff would begin work immediately on operational steps and would return to the board with updates.

