Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Acceleration Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Urbana SD 116 reviews acceleration policy, flags equity and referral-deadline concerns
Summary
District staff presented the acceleration policy, explained a Jan. 31 referral deadline and screening process using MAP/AIMSweb/Panorama data, and reported current qualifying counts; board members urged stronger teacher training and direct family outreach to make the process more equitable.
A district administrator identified in the transcript as Jessica briefed the board on Urbana SD 116's acceleration policy, the referral process and next steps to improve equity and communication.
Jessica described three types of acceleration used in the district: early entrance to kindergarten or first grade, single-subject acceleration and whole-grade acceleration. She said referral forms must be submitted by Jan. 31 so schools can run screening and evaluation procedures that rely on MAP, AIMSweb and Panorama student surveys as screening data.
The administrator outlined the multi-step evaluation: referral collection, screening based on cut scores, school-based acceleration teams (including a building administrator, school psychologist, social worker, classroom teacher and parent/guardian) performing in-depth assessments, and written parent consent for both evaluation and any acceleration plan. She said the district uses fall and winter MAP windows for screening and that eligible students proceed to building-level evaluations through May.
Jessica reported recent qualifying counts for the current year: 16 elementary students in single-subject acceleration and one whole-grade acceleration; several secondary students are in single-subject acceleration (five sixth-grade center students attending seventh-grade math, multiple other middle and high school placements). She noted exceptions may be made under the Illinois Accelerated Placement Act (as referenced in the presentation) and that students moving into the district will be considered if prior assessment data are available.
Board members raised equity concerns, noting families who know how to navigate the system are currently more likely to secure acceleration for their children. One member said some families and teachers are unaware of the referral process; board members recommended improved communication to families and training so teachers know they may make referrals. Jessica said the district will form a committee to update MAP cut scores to align with 2025 MAP revisions and will improve outreach to families, including targeted letters to students who meet screening criteria.
She also explained appeals procedures (appeals to the superintendent) and the district's plan to check accelerated placements within 30 days and require end‑of‑course exams at secondary levels to ensure readiness.
Next steps: convene a committee to review screening criteria and MAP cut scores, strengthen teacher training on referral procedures and send direct notifications to families when students meet screening thresholds.
