Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fees And Transparency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents press Clayton council over Master Fee Schedule and Pride Parade; council member requests special meeting

Clayton City Council · April 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Residents urged Clayton leaders for transparency on a proposed Master Fee Schedule and asked the council to support the Pride Parade. Councilmember Trupiano requested a special meeting before Aug. 15 to continue fee-schedule discussions.

Multiple residents used the public-comment period on June 20 to press the Clayton City Council for more transparency about a proposed Master Fee Schedule and to urge support for the recent Pride Parade.

Commenters included Ed Hartley (who also praised a recent “Coffee with the City Manager” but raised concerns about fees and elimination of master agreements), J Smyth (who raised a potential Brown Act technical violation from a prior meeting), Keith Haydon (who questioned the formula used to set fees), and Terri Denslow (who said anonymous letters criticized the Pride Parade and asked for more transparency). Supporters of the Pride Parade included Rebecca Nolen and Christine Muller, the latter thanking councilmembers Cloven and Tillman for their support and urging full council support next year.

In response to the sustained public concern about the Master Fee Schedule, Councilmember Trupiano requested a special meeting before Aug. 15 to continue the Master Fee Schedule discussion and allow additional public input. Council did not take a formal vote on changes to the fee schedule at the June 20 meeting.