Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CCRPC approves 45‑day notice for 4.999 MW South Burlington battery project and endorses Colchester solar petition review
Summary
The committee found the South Burlington 4.999 MW BESS and a 150 kW Colchester solar project in conformance with the 2018 Chittenden County ECOS Plan subject to permits and potential constraints; both review letters were approved unanimously for submission.
The Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Joint Executive & Finance Committee reviewed two land-use filings Sept. 7 and unanimously approved letters advancing both reviews.
Taylor Newton, planning program manager, presented a 45-day Act 250 notice for a proposed 4.999 MW Battery Energy Storage System at Community Drive in South Burlington (South Burlington Tech Park BESS 1 LLC). CCRPC staff concluded the project is in conformance with the Planning Areas of the 2018 Chittenden County ECOS Plan and noted a determination of energy compliance by the Vermont Department of Public Service. Staff identified potential constraints including one known river-corridor constraint, possible agricultural and hydric soils, possible riparian-connectivity impacts and a known local water-protection buffer constraint. The committee voted to approve the 45-day notice letter as presented.
Newton also presented a Section 248 full petition from Aegis Renewable Energy for a 150 kW solar array at 0 Mercier Drive in Colchester (town-owned parcel). CCRPC found the proposal meets ECOS Plan suitability and constraints policies provided a wetlands permit is received from the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources; Newton said CCRPC will review subsequent submittals and noted project details may change between advance notice and final petition. Jacki Murphy asked how applicants typically respond to CCRPC comments; Newton said developers usually address concerns at the full-petition stage. The committee approved the Section 248 petition letter unanimously.
Both approvals were advisory submittals from CCRPC; staff emphasized CCRPC is reviewing and flagging constraints for permitting authorities and that final project approvals rest with other agencies.
