Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Digital Learning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CHCCS presents draft digital learning plan emphasizing instruction-first approach and stronger vendor vetting
Summary
District staff unveiled a first‑draft districtwide digital learning plan that prioritizes instruction‑first technology use, five implementation domains, professional learning, tighter vendor vetting, and proposals such as GoGuardian teacher for grades 2–12 and phasing out K–2 iPads.
Get email alerts on the Digital Learning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District staff presented the first draft of Chapel Hill‑Carrboro City Schools’ digital learning plan, framed around the principle that technology should support — not drive — instruction.
Presenters described five domains (leadership and vision; curriculum/instruction/assessment; human capacity; infrastructure/devices; data privacy/security), a three‑year phased rollout, and a set of priority summer/fall actions including publishing a centralized, public list of approved digital resources with time‑use guidance; increasing restrictions on general YouTube access; requiring GoGuardian Teacher for grades 2–12; and planning to phase out one‑to‑one iPads in K–2 over the next renewal cycle. Staff emphasized centralized vetting, privacy agreements for vendors (using NCDPI templates), and professional learning for teachers and digital‑learning coaches.
Public commenters and several board members praised the plan’s emphasis on well‑being and consistency but asked for clearer definitions of ‘‘intentional tech use,’’ a parent opt‑out or declination form, stronger vendor auditing and data‑deletion procedures, and explicit metrics for measuring the plan’s impact on student mental health and learning.
Why it matters: The plan affects classroom practice, student privacy, device allocation and vendor contracting across all CHCCS schools; it will guide procurement, training and communications with families.
What’s next: Staff requested board feedback and intend to return with a final version in May after additional rounds of stakeholder input and quality checks.
