Get AI Briefings, Transcripts & Alerts on Local & National Government Meetings — Forever.
Selah School Board leans toward bell‑to‑bell cell‑phone ban after months of study
Loading...
Summary
After months of surveys and site‑level variation in practice, the Selah School Board signaled support for a strict bell‑to‑bell ban on telecommunication devices, directing staff to prepare a first‑reading draft for policy 3245 and procedures ahead of a May reading and anticipated June adoption.
The Selah School Board moved toward adopting a districtwide bell‑to‑bell ban on student use of cell phones and other internet‑capable devices, citing research on mental health and academic focus and persistent uneven enforcement at school sites.
"I would argue in favor of proposal C," the board chair said during an extended discussion of three options for policy 3245, referring to the strictest proposal that would prohibit device use during the regular school day except for emergencies or administrator‑authorized instructional uses. Board members, student representatives and administrators debated enforcement, age differentiation and possible use of Yondr pouches or lockers.
The proposal comes after the district gathered parent, staff and student survey responses and convened principal roundtables and student board representatives to study how phones are used at elementary, middle and high school levels. Superintendent Kevin McKay told trustees that drafting clear procedures will be necessary to make any policy change effective: "The procedural part is what matters many times, with regards to the buildings, the staff, and the students." He said administration will return with draft policy language and proposed procedures for the board's first reading.
Student board representatives warned about practical enforcement challenges. One student representative said, "Students are going to try to find a way around that," reflecting concern that inconsistent classroom practices could undercut policy goals. Another trustee said the appeal of a single rule is simplicity: "It's just so much easier and simpler to just go bell to bell," a board member said.
Trustees discussed exemptions already built into the proposals — for emergencies involving imminent physical danger and for administrator‑authorized instructional activities — and asked staff to clarify whether those authorizations could include teacher‑led classroom activities that require internet access. District staff noted Chromebooks are available for many instructional uses but acknowledged some teachers still rely on phones for specific tasks.
Next steps: the board directed administration to prepare a revised draft of policy 3245 reflecting proposal C and a companion set of procedures for enforcement and communication. The draft is expected for the board's first reading at the next business meeting, with adoption targeted for June and stakeholder communications planned during July and August to prepare schools and families for implementation.
