Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Community Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bozeman adopts technical compliance update to community plan ahead of state deadline

Bozeman City Commission · October 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission unanimously adopted a technical compliance update to the Bozeman Community Plan to satisfy Montana Land Use Planning Act requirements; debate focused on a separate parcel-level map request and neighborhood notice for a Plum Avenue change.

The Bozeman City Commission on Oct. 28 adopted by resolution a technical compliance update to the Bozeman Community Plan to align the city’s document with recent changes in state law.

Chris Saunders (city staff) told the commission the update is a ‘‘technical compliance’’ exercise required by the 2023 and 2025 legislatures and said staff must complete the plan plus implementing land-use regulations by May 16, 2026. Tom Rogers, senior planner, walked the commission through the plan’s five chapters, issue-plan links and appendices and described how population, housing and infrastructure data were incorporated from external consultants (Economic & Planning Systems; HDR).

Why it matters: the Montana Land Use Planning Act changed review criteria and timing; the technical update updates references, data and the future land use map to meet statutory requirements. Adoption preserves staff’s path to meet the May 2026 deadline while staff continues longer-range policy work in future five-year reviews.

Public comment included a request from Scott Bechtel (Bechtel Architects) and a property owner ("Gus") to amend a single Plum Avenue parcel from Urban Neighborhood to Community Commercial Mixed Use to facilitate mixed retail and employee housing. Commissioners and staff discussed that request during deliberations and several commissioners said the parcel-level change would be better processed as a separate growth-policy and zone-map amendment with formal neighborhood notice and application fees (staff cited ~$3,300 for a growth-policy amendment and ~$3,800 for a zone-map amendment).

Commission discussion also touched on interlocal coordination with Gallatin County, the role of issue plans such as the Sensitive Lands Plan (listed in Appendix B20), and how implementation tools like the Unified Development Code and capital improvements program will follow adoption.

After deliberations, Commissioner Majer moved to adopt the staff-recommended technical compliance update; the motion was seconded and passed unanimously.

What’s next: staff will publish the adopted plan documents on the city website, proceed with UDC implementation steps and continue public outreach; the Plum Avenue parcel request remains available as a standalone growth-policy/zone-map amendment and may return with formal neighborhood outreach and application materials.