Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioner raises appraisal, tax-freeze and election-boundary errors; staff asked to review Patriot data contract
Summary
Commissioner Rogers told the Sumner County Legislative Committee that a parcel subject to a tax freeze was assessed with increased acreage and an approximately $600 tax increase; the committee asked legal and finance staff to review the Patriot data contract and instructed the assessor to seek available data and report back next month.
Commissioner (Comm.) Rogers told the Sumner County Legislative Committee on Jan. 13 that a parcel belonging to his father was reassessed with increased acreage, producing about a $600 rise in taxes despite a tax freeze that Rogers said should cover the dwelling plus five acres. Rogers also said the parcel is split between county commission districts two and five and that the City of Portland’s election boundary for the parcel is incorrect, creating confusion for voters and tax liabilities.
County Mayor John Isbell advised Rogers to file an appeal with the State Board of Equalization to contest the assessment. Tax Assessor John Hurt told the committee that, after a system change, Patriot (the vendor) did not supply complete data; Hurt said his understanding was that Patriot previously expected roughly $50,000–$60,000 per year to provide access to the historic data. Law Director Eric Sitler confirmed the committee’s role is limited to review and recommended staff examine contractual options.
Chairman Jeremy Mansfield asked Sitler and the finance staff to review the county’s contract with Patriot and asked Hurt to contact Patriot to determine whether the data still exists and what the current cost would be to obtain it. The committee left the matter on the old-business docket for a report next month.
Why it matters: The committee’s next steps — contract review and potential appeal to the State Board of Equalization — determine whether affected property owners can correct assessed values and tax bills. Access to historical parcel data from Patriot could be necessary to resolve multiple contested assessments if similar system errors occurred elsewhere.
What was not decided: The minutes record no final correction, adjudication or payment adjustments; Rogers was told to pursue an appeal and the committee did not adopt a policy change or an immediate remedy at the Jan. 13 meeting.
Next step: Staff were directed to return with findings on the Patriot data availability and contract terms at the next monthly meeting.
