Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the District Attorney Conduct topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges Clinton County Legislature to investigate district attorney over courtroom conduct
Summary
Dr. Gregory Heismann told the Clinton County Legislature during public comment that the district attorney threatened to remove a person from a public building for questioning courtroom procedure, urged the legislature to question the DA at a public meeting and suggested impeachment or removal if integrity concerns persist.
Get email alerts on the District Attorney Conduct topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dr. Gregory Heismann, a resident who identified himself at the start of the meeting, used his allotted public-comment time to allege misconduct by the county district attorney and urged the Clinton County Legislature to investigate.
"My name is doctor Gregory Heismann," Heismann said. He described a recent encounter in which he said the district attorney "threaten[ed] to remove someone from a public building for simply questioning why he is not following a state procedural code of the Van Sickle doctrine." He said the DA's response to public questioning and a subsequent confrontation — including, Heismann alleged, the DA calling a sheriff's deputy on his personal cell phone — showed a poor regard for public accountability.
Heismann urged legislators to press the district attorney at a public meeting and, if they find his conduct unacceptable, to "push the state with articles of impeachment, or . . . the governor to remove him from office and make a threshold election," saying the DA's actions could ultimately cost the county "millions of dollars." He described the underlying dispute as involving interpretation of what he called the "Van Sickle doctrine," which he tied to prosecution procedures and a New York State court decision.
The comment period ended with no direct response from the legislature recorded in the transcript. The legislature proceeded to committee reports and the evening's docket of resolutions.
The allegation is a citizen's public comment, not a formal complaint filed in county records, and no response from the district attorney is recorded in the meeting transcript. The legislature did not take any formal investigatory action on the record during this session.

