Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cultural Sites topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee defers cultural‑site protections and supports Mauna Lahila restoration plan
Summary
DPR asked the committee to defer a bill establishing an Important Cultural Resource Area program so the department can convene a working group to resolve implementation gaps; the committee also supported a resolution urging restoration of Mauna Lahila Cultural Garden with additional cultural and archaeological review.
Get email alerts on the Cultural Sites topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The committee held two related cultural-site items March 31: Bill 31, which would create an Important Cultural Resource Area program for city parks, and Resolution 26-65 urging restoration and activation of the Mauna Lahila Cultural Garden in Makaha.
Deputy Director Kehaopu'u said DPR supports the intent of Bill 31 but identified implementation concerns: the bill lacks criteria for determining whether a group or individual has adequate skill to be a steward, offers no process for resolving competing steward claims, and expects DPR to manage a program without cultural resource specialists on staff. Kehaopu'u recommended the committee defer the bill and let DPR convene a working group with council representatives, the Department of Cultural Affairs/Oahu historic-preservation entities, and other stakeholders to draft clarifying, implementable language. The chair agreed and postponed Bill 31 for future discussion.
On Resolution 26-65, DPR supported the intent to restore Mauna Lahila but recommended a coordinated path forward that includes updating cultural-impact assessments, reviewing archaeological site-preservation plans created in 2007, and formalizing community partnerships. Chair Tupula and council members emphasized neighborhood stewardship and potential near-term security and maintenance steps while the longer master-planning work proceeds.
Ending: Bill 31 was postponed to allow DPR to form a working group and return with clarifying amendments; Resolution 26-65 was reported out for adoption with DPR’s recommendation to pursue a staged, collaborative restoration process.

