Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Levy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Iowa City Comm School District board hears public opposition to proposed FY27 property tax levy
Summary
At a March 24 special meeting, the Iowa City Comm School District board held a public hearing on a proposed FY27 property tax levy; residents objected to a proposed $4.1 million management-levy increase and raised allegations about large internal transfers, missing audits and penalties. The board closed the hearing and adjourned without taking a vote on the levy.
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Levy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Iowa City Comm School District board of directors held a special meeting and public hearing March 24 to review a proposed fiscal year 2027 property tax levy that district staff said would include a roughly $4.1 million increase to the management levy.
Residents filled the public-comment period with sharp criticism of the proposed increase and the district’s financial management. "Taxes are killing me," said Kirk Moore, who told the board he has lived in Iowa City since 1965 and called for greater accountability after alleging a $10,000,000 internal transfer and unpaid audits. "Why is that happening? Why wasn't there an audit?" he asked.
A resident later identified as Kim Christiansen offered detailed figures she said show the district’s property taxes have risen nearly 58% since 2017 while district enrollment grew about 2.8%. "Taxes are growing 21% faster than the combined growth of enrollment and inflation," she said, and she cited prior interfund transfers she described as $14,000,000 in fiscal 2024 and several tax- and filing-penalty amounts reported in district records.
Another speaker, Dennis Visser, questioned the timing of the hearing and repeated concerns about internal transfers and unreconciled bank statements. He urged the board to reduce administrative costs and said he opposed a proposed increase he described as roughly $12,000,000 in school taxes overall.
District staff addressed the hearing’s specific levy proposal. A district official identified in the transcript by role explained the management fund and levy primarily pay retiree health-insurance costs tied to an early-retirement program and said the proposed increase would restore the levy to prior funding levels to cover outgoing payments. "Our management fund, levy pays, health insurance costs for retirees as part of an early retirement program," the official said.
Speakers asked for line items, audit documentation and reconciliations in the certified budget presentation that would show the reasons for the levy increase; speakers from the public said they could not find those entries in the budget summary during the hearing. No board vote on the levy was taken at the special meeting: after public comment the chair closed the hearing and the board moved to adjourn the meeting, recording a voice roll of "Aye" responses before ending the session.
Why this matters: the management levy increase and the broader levy proposal would affect property-tax bills for homeowners and businesses in Johnson County; speakers at the hearing said that without clearer budget line items, audits and reconciliations they could not support the request. The board did not take final action on the levy at this meeting and will consider next steps in future proceedings.
The meeting record on March 24 shows the board set the hearing date on March 10 and that notice was published in the Iowa City Press-Citizen on March 12; residents at the hearing urged the board to provide clearer financial reconciliation, publish completed audits and examine administrative costs before asking taxpayers to pay more.

