Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Roofing Materials topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
DRC split over cedar shakes after applicant presents archival and roofer evidence
Summary
An applicant seeking retroactive approval for cedar shakes and EPDM for a low‑slope area presented aerial photos and roofer analyses; commissioners were split on whether the evidence established historic use and urged further documentation at the voting meeting.
At the committee’s March session, Scott Cash presented months of archival research, aerial imagery and two independent roofing assessments to support retroactive approval of a cedar shake roof on his 1930s home at Miles Manor Court and a request to use EPDM on a low‑slope rear section.
Staff said EPDM is appropriate for the limited low‑slope area because it is not visible from the street. On cedar shakes, staff noted new evidence including a signed letter from a previous owner and roofer reports indicating nail patterns consistent with an earlier wood roof, but also said there is no single clear historic photograph proving cedar was original to the house.
Commissioners were divided. Some, including one member who said the photographic and roofer evidence created reasonable doubt, said they would be inclined to support the cedar shakes; others said the commission has historically required stronger photographic proof and cautioned that allowing retroactive changes without conclusive evidence could set a difficult precedent. Several commissioners urged the applicant to bring the roofing professionals to testify or provide additional corroborating documentation for the voting packet.
The DRC gave preliminary feedback but did not vote. Staff advised the applicant to prepare a complete packet, including the historic photo evidence, professional reports, and a clear statement of what part of the roof is being sought for EPDM versus cedar shakes.
