Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Gifted Programming topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Middle‑level gifted review proposes 'push‑in' model and project‑based units

Perkiomen Valley School District — Education Committee of the Whole · March 13, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Dr. Moulton told the Education Committee the district is weighing a push‑in model for middle‑school gifted services, along with advanced sections and project‑based learning, to replace extra work with differentiated, meaningful challenges.

Dr. Moulton presented possible changes to middle‑level gifted services, saying the district is considering a push‑in model that would integrate gifted teachers into general‑education classrooms rather than relying solely on pullout enrichment.

The proposal would allow general‑education teachers to compact curriculum where mastery is demonstrated and provide deeper, higher‑order assignments such as advanced literature circles, independent research, design challenges and humanities projects. “Students and families were upset that students were getting more work,” Moulton said. “They didn’t want more work. They wanted different work.”

Board members raised concerns about social dynamics in mixed‑ability cohorts and whether differentiation would become added homework rather than a replacement for existing assignments. A committee member recalled an alternative model from another district in which gifted students attended a daily graded class that replaced ELA; proponents said that model provided a dedicated space for advanced learners to “show off” learning without feeling penalized.

Administration said those models and recent task‑force work will be folded into an action plan. Dr. Nicholson said the current discussion is an early step in a longer review and that administrators will gather further feedback, including from building principals and staff, before recommending a final model. Dr. Moulton noted teachers identified problem‑based learning, critical thinking, debate and ethical inquiry as priorities for enrichment.

What happens next: the committee expects additional updates next month and plans to include feedback from prior reviews before advancing a formal recommendation.