Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Overview topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Las Cruces previews $185M preliminary FY2026–27 budget; council presses on deficit and priorities
Summary
City staff presented a preliminary FY2026–27 general‑fund revenue projection of about $185 million and described spending priorities — youth programs, affordable housing, traffic and facility repairs — while councilors pressed for plans to close a projected gap and for more program‑level participation and cost metrics.
Get email alerts on the Budget Overview topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Leslie Doyle presented the Las Cruces preliminary FY2026–27 budget to the City Council on March 23, laying out a general‑fund revenue projection of roughly $185,000,000 and the major priorities staff say are reflected in the draft. The presentation said the city adopted a $166 million budget in FY26 and revised it to about $178 million; the new projection reflects a modest GRT assumption and other revenue updates.
The presentation focused on council‑identified priorities including youth engagement, affordable housing, traffic and pedestrian safety, municipal court improvements, animal welfare, utility preparedness, communications and mental‑health expansion. Doyle told the council that the revenue outlook assumes a 3% year‑over‑year increase in gross receipts tax and noted franchise and cannabis revenue estimates presented on the slides.
Councilors pressed staff on how to close the gap between general‑fund revenues and expenditures. Councilor Harris described the shortfall as "the elephant in the room" and asked what should worry the council most; Doyle said staff have already implemented reductions, are re‑examining transfers (a large portion of which fund debt service) and will present more concrete options at the next work session and before budget adoption in May. She emphasized that transfers had been reduced from last year and that staff were continuing to identify opportunities to tighten spending.
Council members also asked for more granular program metrics. Councilor Batiste requested participation and reach figures for out‑of‑school programs to assess per‑person cost; parks staff later supplied preliminary numbers for after‑school slots and fill rates and promised a more detailed breakdown.
Doyle and department directors highlighted several line‑items already included in the draft budget: a transit match transfer (about $4 million), senior‑nutrition and utility‑assistance programs, community schools agreements with Las Cruces Public Schools, and a $100,000 set‑aside to address gun violence. Staff said some capital and maintenance projects — facility repairs, traffic calming, and fire‑station updates — are included but that the city is still finalizing revenue and expense details ahead of the April work session and May adoption.
The council did not take any final budget votes at the session; staff outlined next steps, including a final work session in April and formal budget adoption expected in May.

