Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Industrial Logistics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
EDA debates rail spur/transload feasibility; members favor outreach over immediate studies
Summary
Dayton EDA members discussed interest from private companies in a rail spur/transload facility, agreeing to first survey nearby businesses and neighboring EDAs about demand rather than immediately spending city funds on a costly feasibility study.
Committee member (S3) told the board that Sunstone had expressed interest in a spur, and described a transload facility — a site to move freight between trucks and trains — as potentially useful but expensive. "This project is going to cost millions of dollars to put together," the committee member said, and staff noted grants might be available but often require local matching funds.
Members pushed back on the idea of the EDA immediately underwriting a feasibility study. One member said businesses often will not contribute unless there is a clear revenue model; another noted King Solutions and other nearby freight businesses could use a spur but may not want to pay for construction. The board coalesced around a lower-cost first step: convene local businesses and EDAs in adjacent cities to gauge real interest and commitment before spending on engineering studies.
Chair Hunter summarized the approach: outreach first, then evaluate whether grant or municipal funding is justified. "So step one is let's generate interest," the chair said. Staff were asked to coordinate a meeting or a mail/phone outreach to businesses within a five-mile radius and with neighboring EDAs in Rogers, Elk River and Champlin.
No formal appropriation was made; members said they would revisit funding if a clear business case emerged.
