Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Licensing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council agrees to send Douglas Depot licensing decision back to committee after owner appeals

Racine Common Council · April 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After an appeal by applicant Khalid Assad, the Racine Common Council voted 14-0 in April 2026 to send the denied cigarette/tobacco/vape license application for Douglas Depot back to the Public Safety & Licensing Committee for further review, citing zoning timing and questions about grandfathering.

The Racine Common Council voted unanimously to send the denied licensing application for Douglas Depot (1615 Douglas Avenue) back to the Public Safety & Licensing Committee after the applicant appealed the committee's unanimous denial.

Applicant Khalid Assad told the council he had invested in renovating an abandoned building and said his application predated recent zoning ordinance changes. "I was denied the licensing for Douglas Depot," Assad said. "I applied for the licensing before the zone ordinances. I was deferred two times at meetings because the zone ordinances weren't updated," he said, asking the council to pull the application for reconsideration.

Alder Weidner, who moved to send the item back to committee, said the committee had unanimously denied the license but expressed concern about the timing of zoning changes and the applicant's claim that he might have been grandfathered based on when he applied. "This young man made a major investment into an abandoned building... it was up to the committee to either grandfather him in or not," Weidner said, urging reconsideration so a new committee could review all information, including the timing of deferrals and any recommendation communications the applicant received.

The council voted 14-0 to refer the matter back to the Public Safety & Licensing Committee for further consideration.

The referral does not reverse the committee's prior decision; it directs the committee to reexamine the application with the additional facts and to report back to the council.