Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Towns Edge Road topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff: Isanti holds Town's Edge Road right-of-way; reclaim-and-pave estimate about $315,000
Summary
City staff told the council a 2003 transfer document conveys the Town's Edge Road right-of-way to the city and recommended a $315,000 reclaim-and-pave (no curb) scheduled for 2029; extending sewer was previously estimated at roughly $3.4 million to serve eight homes, making utility extension cost-prohibitive without development.
Jason Cook, a city staff member, told the council that a March 2003 document appears to have conveyed the full Town's Edge Road corridor and maintenance responsibility to the city, simplifying ownership questions and leaving the city responsible for reconstruction costs.
Cook said the city previously budgeted a full urban rebuild with curb, gutter and utility extensions but now recommends a reclaim-and-pave without curb, which he estimated at roughly $315,000 in today’s dollars compared with a previously planned $500,000 curb-and-gutter rebuild. “For the most part, it looks like the city has full control over that, full right away,” Cook said.
The recommendation reflects a capital-plan change: the most recent capital improvement plan removed water and sewer extension for that segment, Cook said, and staff concluded the pavement is too deteriorated for a mill-and-overlay. Reclaiming and paving, he said, provides longer useful life and reduces stormwater infrastructure complications that a curb-and-gutter urban section would require.
Cook told the council a prior sewer-extension analysis estimated about $3.4 million to extend sewer and serve eight homes, a cost the staff said is not cost-effective absent a developer-driven project. “The cost to do that was, you know, on the order of $3,400,000, and it was gonna service 8 homes,” Cook said.
On funding, staff estimated roughly 25% of the project could be assessable (about $45,000) with the remainder covered by the city (roughly $160,000 under current assumptions). Council members questioned the fairness of assessing a small number of properties for a road used by a larger portion of the city; one council member said, “That’s too much for 8.”
Council members asked staff to gather more data before changing the schedule. Staff said a traffic counter could be installed quickly and inexpensively to capture average daily traffic counts, though Cook did not expect the data to change pavement-section design. Cook recommended keeping the project slated for 2029 and updating the long-term capital improvement plan to reflect the city’s current cost estimate and timing.
Next steps: staff will provide the underlying document showing the 2003 transfer for attorney review if council wants further legal confirmation, and staff will return with updated capital-plan figures and any traffic-count data collected.
