Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get AI Briefings, Transcripts & Alerts on Local & National Government Meetings — Forever.

Court docket: multiple guilty pleas, deferred probations and resets at 252nd District Court

252nd District Court · April 28, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The 252nd District Court handled several plea deals, deferred dispositions and case resets in a single docket call, including deferred probations, a DWI plea agreement with probation conditions, and multiple two‑week resets for expected resolutions.

At a Feb. 16 docket call in the 252nd District Court, the judge handled a slate of guilty pleas, deferred dispositions and procedural resets for a range of cases.

Among the items recorded, a DWI case involved a plea agreement the judge described as ‘‘a 10‑year term in prison that would be probated for five years’’ with a $500 fine; the judge clarified the sentencing language on the record before accepting the plea and advising the defendant that a plea could carry immigration consequences and a waiver of appeal. For another matter the court accepted a three‑year deferred probation agreement and a $500 fine in an evading‑arrest case; the judge accepted the defendant’s plea, found him competent and reset the case for a presentence report.

The court also took a deferred five‑year offer in an assault‑family‑violence matter that includes a $500 fine, participation in AA or anger‑management classes, and a one‑week reset to allow counsel to discuss and finalize the details with the complaining witness. Ronnie Lonzo pleaded guilty to a lesser‑included class A misdemeanor attempted theft and the judge deferred proceedings and placed him on two years’ deferred probation with a $500 fine.

Several matters were continued to allow counsel to finalize plea agreements or travel logistics; the judge repeatedly reminded defendants who were out on bond that they must consult with attorneys, meet the court’s conditions (including no‑contact provisions where ordered), and return with the names of attorneys consulted to avoid bond sanctions.