Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administrative Rule Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House adopts bill tightening administrative rule reviews and clarifying when state agencies must respond to discovery requests
Summary
On April 27 the Colorado House passed Senate Bill 137 to strengthen five‑year reviews of administrative rules and to clarify discovery procedures when the attorney general sues or is sued; opponents pressed concerns about access to agency records and an amendment to preserve current‑case discovery rules failed.
Senate Bill 137, a bill the clerk described as updating the state rule‑review process and clarifying the attorney general G uthority on discovery, was adopted by the Colorado House on April 27 after more than an hour of debate.
Sponsors said the measure tightens the existing five‑year review of administrative rules to require committees of reference to examine whether rules are redundant, outdated or impose unnecessary costs on consumers and businesses. "This is good governance," Minority Leader Caldwell said in support, arguing the bill will improve transparency and reduce needless regulatory burden.
A second component of the bill drew sustained scrutiny: language would change how discovery is obtained from state agencies when the attorney general is a party. Representative Luck questioned whether the provision would limit defendants ccess to documents in existing or future cases. "If you change the rules in the middle of pending litigation, you're changing the playing field," Luck said, urging narrower, case‑specific language.
Representative Richardson and others debated whether the provision arose from a specific multi‑state case involving a large technology company and the attorney general's office. The House considered and rejected Amendment L‑003, which would have limited the new discovery standard to future cases and preserved the existing rules for pending litigation. The amendment failed on a recorded voice division after proponent and sponsor arguments were heard.
Sponsors said the measure largely codifies a court decision that the attorney general s a party oes not create blanket agency control over records and that third‑party discovery remains available. "We are trying to reduce administrative burdens on the state," the sponsor said, urging colleagues to support the bill.
The House adopted the bill after debate and committee report presentation. The text directs departments to strengthen review criteria and to present rule reviews to committees, and it clarifies the mechanism for obtaining agency records in discovery when the AG is a plaintiff, according to supporters.
What happens next: Senate Bill 137 will be enrolled and transmitted for further processing; the House record notes the committee report and floor debate that led to its adoption.
