Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Planned Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission recommends large single‑family-for‑rent planned development on Conquest Boulevard

Waxahachie Planning & Zoning Commission · May 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission recommended approval of ZDC91-2024, a planned development proposing about 300 dwelling units across 165 structures (single-family-for-rent model) on land east of 2050 Conquest Boulevard; staff and the developer highlighted pedestrian orientation, 548 attached garages, and phased construction.

The Waxahachie Planning & Zoning Commission on May 27 recommended approval of ZDC91-2024, a planned development proposal for a horizontal mixed‑use project on roughly 49 acres east of 2050 Conquest Boulevard that would deliver a single‑family‑for‑rent product: about 300 dwelling units in 165 structures with a variety of unit types, pedestrian Paseos, and limited commercial frontage along Highway 287.

Staff explained the design includes three commercial tracks (about 3.7 acres reserved for pedestrian‑oriented retail), roughly eight acres of preserved green space along a creek, and a phasing plan with Phase 1 including 103 units and the amenity tract; staff emphasized access plans and fire‑marshal review. Zach said the developer proposes 548 attached garages—exceeding the minimum required parking—and a mix of one‑ and two‑story buildings and multiple elevation palettes to reduce monotony. Developer Shannon Livingston said the product is intended as professionally managed rental housing targeted at families and transitional households and estimated rents at roughly $2.10 per square foot, adding the developer would manage the property through its property‑management arm, RR Living. Commissioners raised questions about addressing for private streets, drainage toward a nearby creek and pond, school‑district impacts and traffic; Commissioner (speaker 6) said school capacity concerns “scare” her. After extensive Q&A, the commission voted to recommend approval; Commissioner (speaker 3) moved the motion. The item will advance to city council for final action.