Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Skate Park Redesign topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Isanti council hears skate-park redesign proposal; vendor offers phased, lower-cost options and cites 96 survey responses
Summary
A contractor presented a plaza-style redesign that reuses the existing slab and equipment; vendor said 96 residents responded to the online survey and supplied sectioned pricing so the city could phase work to fit budgets between $75,000 and $150,000.
Get email alerts on the Skate Park Redesign topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council members weighed whether to fund a full skate-park redesign now or phase work and prioritize other projects such as pickleball courts.
David Shine of Ramparts summarized the park-board recommendation and said the board asked the company to include a BMX feature because of heavy BMX use next door. "We did receive 96 responses to the skate park survey, which is a really high amount," Shine told the committee.
A designer for the vendor described a plaza-style approach that reconfigures and reuses existing equipment and the concrete slab, saying that approach accelerates construction and reduces cost compared with full replacement. He explained construction would mix precast and cast-in-place concrete and estimated that, if approved, the company could be full in production within seven to 10 days. The designer also said properly built concrete elements can have a 25–50 year lifespan but noted that design preferences in action sports can cause features to feel "aged" sooner.
Council members discussed funding. Staff reported that, "counting in the money that we've committed to spend at Woodland Park, we have about $290,000 left," and members discussed options to reduce scope: section 1 of the vendor quote was listed at $66,000 and section 2 at $8,749. Several members urged phasing the project to spread cost, while others suggested soliciting quotes for four to six pickleball courts and pursuing outside funding for those facilities.
No formal vote to proceed was taken; multiple members recommended holding major spending decisions until spring and asked staff and the vendor for phased cost estimates and additional quotes for pickleball facilities.

