Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Accessory Structures topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves accessory‑structure permits with conditions, including removal requirement

Waxahachie Planning and Zoning Commission · July 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Waxahachie's planning commission recommended approval July 15 for accessory‑structure permits that exceed 700 sq ft at two properties; one approval includes a written commitment to remove a deteriorated structure as a condition.

The Waxahachie Planning & Zoning Commission on July 15 recommended approval of specific‑use permits authorizing accessory structures greater than 700 square feet at properties including 407 Brown Street (ZDC‑67‑2025) and 601 North Grand Avenue (ZDC‑74‑2025), subject to the conditions in staff reports.

At 407 Brown St, staff explained the property is historic and the applicants, Andy and Susan Rubman, said they are restoring a folk‑Victorian home and proposed a freestanding carport because attaching it to the house would harm the historic fabric. Staff said the detached garage dates to about 1985; neighbors and commissioners pressed the applicants to remove an existing accessory building behind the garage. The applicants said they intend to remove that deteriorated accessory structure and to reuse historic materials where possible; commissioners made the written removal commitment a condition of approval. One commissioner said, "If you do that first, then you got a yes vote for me." The commission recommended approval with that written commitment and standard staff conditions.

At 601 North Grand, staff reported the property sits on more than an acre and that the proposed accessory structure would be consistent with other large‑lot accessory buildings. Applicant Thomas Schafer confirmed the design and said there would be no separate driveway or separate utilities beyond the primary structure. The commission recommended approval subject to staff conditions.

Motion and vote: Both SUP recommendations were approved by voice vote with the standard staff conditions; the Rubman approval includes a documented commitment to remove a specified accessory building as part of the condition.

Why it matters: These approvals allow property owners to proceed with larger accessory buildings while the commission used conditions to manage neighborhood impacts and preserve historical character.

Next steps: Planning staff will forward the recommendations and condition language to city council for final action and will monitor code compliance and building‑permit capturing.