Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Drive Through topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Little Elm council approves McDonald’s drive‑through after applicant adds masonry wall, reduces hours
Summary
After Planning & Zoning recommended denial, the Little Elm Town Council approved a special‑use permit for a McDonald’s drive‑through at El Dorado and Hillside Road after the applicant agreed to an 8‑foot masonry screening wall, reduced hours (5 a.m.–11 p.m.) and other mitigations.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Drive Through topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Little Elm Town Council on March 3 approved a special‑use permit for a McDonald’s drive‑through at the northeast corner of El Dorado Park and Hillside Road after the applicant revised its plans to address neighbors’ concerns.
Leslie Ford, who identified herself as representing the applicant, told the council the company had added an 8‑foot masonry screening wall, reduced proposed operating hours from 24 hours to 5 a.m.–11 p.m., agreed to an added deceleration lane and offered to proportionally share traffic‑mitigation costs. Ford said the restaurant would increase trash pickup frequency and use an adaptive speaker system designed to lower outdoor order‑speaker volumes when ambient noise drops. “We are really trying to be good neighbors there,” Ford said.
Planning staff reported that the site is zoned commercial and the comprehensive plan designates the area for commercial retail. Staff told council that the applicant’s revised plan includes masonry screening and other changes and that fire engineering’s preliminary review found no construction‑level issues. At the Planning & Zoning hearing on Feb. 5, staff said, commissioners voted 4–2 to recommend denial over concerns about proximity to homes, noise, screening and traffic; the applicant appealed that recommendation to council.
Council members pressed the applicant and staff on practical details during the public hearing: the location and future placement of trash enclosures, hours and the effectiveness of the acoustic technology, and whether piled‑up vehicles in queue lanes would be visible from the right of way. In response, staff and the applicant said the current site layout constrains dumpster placement but that the design includes a future pad so a double dumpster could be added by a future tenant. Ford said the company’s photometric plan did not show light spill into neighboring windows and that the proposed landscaping and wall would reduce sight and sound impacts.
After a motion and second, the council voted to adopt Ordinance 18‑43 approving the specific‑use permit with the amendments presented that evening. The chair announced the ordinance passed; the record shows the council voted in favor and the motion carried.
The decision follows several residents’ concerns raised to Planning & Zoning about noise, trash, and property values; the applicant presented revised plans and technical exhibits to address those points. The council’s action allows the applicant to proceed under the conditions described at the March 3 meeting.
