Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Wayzata board committee recommends MSBA, Gail Gilman, to lead board self-evaluation and development

Wayzata Public Schools Board of Education · March 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The superintendent-evaluation committee recommended engaging the Minnesota School Boards Association and facilitator Gail Gilman for a board self-evaluation and development workshop; the board discussed format and timing but did not take a formal vote and asked to coordinate scheduling with the superintendent's office.

The Wayzata Public School District superintendent-evaluation committee recommended that the board engage the Minnesota School Boards Association (MSBA) and facilitator Gail Gilman to conduct a board self-evaluation and follow-up development work, the board heard March 23.

Chair Milin Sohani read the committee's recommendation, citing MSBA's Minnesota-specific governance expertise, positive reference feedback on Gilman's facilitation and a combined evaluation-and-development engagement the committee viewed as practical and efficient for the board's needs.

Sohani said the committee reviewed three proposals and weighed scope, relevant experience, references, fit and cost. Board members expressed support for an in-person process and for starting with a self-evaluation to identify development needs. One board member described the value of an in-room, facilitated session: "She's gonna touch base with each board member, and... we're going to do a self evaluation in a room together," reflecting the group's preference for an in-person workshop to produce clear next steps.

Members discussed logistics. The facilitator's proposal described a virtual option and a more comprehensive in-person engagement; Sohani and other members relayed that the facilitator quoted roughly $300 for a virtual session and an additional fee for an in-person visit. The facilitator indicated she would interview board members individually, compile a survey, and work with the board to define development priorities.

Board members also noted timing and inclusion of the incoming superintendent. The facilitator said she would need about six weeks lead time if selected; members suggested including Dr. Virgen in planning or portions of the session because he will lead district operations going forward.

The committee's recommendation was presented for discussion only; the board did not hold a formal vote. Sohani said the next step is to coordinate scheduling and engagement details with the superintendent's office and MSBA. The board's next regular meeting is scheduled for April 20.