Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Aviation Leasing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fort Lauderdale commission accepts advisory board’s recommendation to form FXE stakeholder group, removes proposed transaction fee

City Commission of the City of Fort Lauderdale · March 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City Commission agreed to move forward with an Aviation Advisory Board recommendation to create a stakeholder work group to finalize Lauderdale Executive Airport (FXE) lease policy and, by consensus, remove a proposed transaction fee from the city’s leasing policy. Staff said the fiscal impact is unknown and FAA uniformity concerns limit ad‑hoc fee arrangements.

The Fort Lauderdale City Commission agreed March 19 to implement two recommendations from the Aviation Advisory Board: create a formal stakeholder group to finalize an airport leasing policy and exclude a proposed transaction fee from that long‑term policy.

Deputy City Manager Chris Cooper told commissioners the advisory board voted unanimously to form a stakeholder work group and separately voted 10–0 that the transaction fee should not be part of the leasing policy. “The transaction fee not be part of the airport’s leasing policy,” Cooper said, summarizing the advisory board’s position and the group’s reasoning that the fee would impose a burden on tenants while delivering limited long‑term benefit.

Commissioners asked for details on the stakeholder group composition and the fiscal effect of removing the transaction fee. Cooper said the board envisioned a small work group made up of advisory board members, city staff and airport tenants, but the exact size and membership would be defined if the commission authorized the recommendation. He also said there is no precise fiscal calculation because the fee’s triggers may never have been met. “Because the transaction fee would have been triggered by certain actions, it is unknown as to whether those actions would have even occurred,” city staff said.

Several commissioners stressed competing priorities. One commissioner noted that a tenant had previously offered up to $1,000,000 to resolve a lease transfer issue and asked whether the city was “giving that up.” Staff and other commissioners cautioned that the Federal Aviation Administration requires airport fees be applied uniformly; charging one tenant and not others could create legal and compliance problems. “When we do that, we can't charge one tenant a fee and not charge all tenants a fee,” a commissioner said, urging caution.

The commission registered consensus to pursue both recommendations: form the stakeholder work group and remove the transaction fee from leases under negotiation and prior leases that included the term, to be implemented by amending the affected lease documents and negotiating future leases without the fee. Staff also flagged that, depending on grant‑assurance language, removing the fee from previously executed leases will require amendments to those specific documents. The commission asked staff to convene the stakeholder group promptly to finalize a draft leasing policy and report back.

Next steps: staff will convene the stakeholder group to develop a recommended leasing policy and, where required by grant assurances, return to the commission to remove the transaction fee from specified leases and renegotiate terms without the fee.