Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Video Gaming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wauconda delays vote on video gaming cafe rules after business concerns
Summary
The Village Board postponed consideration of an ordinance defining and restricting 'video gaming cafes' after trustees and business representatives said draft language — including a six-month liquor-license requirement before eligibility — could deter businesses and improperly include existing service stations.
The Wauconda Village Board postponed action on an ordinance to define and regulate "video gaming cafes" after discussion and public comments raised concerns that the draft language could unintentionally bar or deter existing businesses from applying for gaming under state law.
Administrator Mary Matson summarized the draft: it defines a video gaming cafe as an establishment whose primary focus is operating gaming terminals with alcohol service and food as incidental; the draft includes factors for determining whether an establishment fits that definition, prohibits issuance of liquor licenses for new video gaming cafes, and requires that an establishment hold a liquor license for six months before becoming eligible for video gaming.
Marty McAlpin, representing Prairie State Gaming and the Phillips 66 on Rand Road, told the board his client is not a "video gaming cafe" and that the ordinance's current language could "rope them under those jurisdictions," potentially limiting their ability to apply for gaming under state law. McAlpin asked the village to clarify the language and said the business intends to pursue amendments and requested the ability to apply without being classified as a gaming cafe.
Trustees voiced concern that the six-month liquor-license requirement and the broader definition could deter new restaurants and small businesses that need predictable startup financing. After discussion a trustee moved and seconded to postpone item A to a future meeting for additional review and possible revision; the board agreed to table the item and return it at a later meeting.
Why it matters: The ordinance would shape which local businesses can host video gaming terminals and whether new establishments could obtain liquor licenses and gaming eligibility quickly. Business representatives argued the draft could classify longstanding service businesses as "video gaming cafes," potentially restricting their options under state law.
Next steps: The board postponed formal consideration to a later meeting so staff and trustees can refine the ordinance language and consider proposed amendments. Business representatives indicated they would bring proposed language for the board to review.
