Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the River Buffer Incentive topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff outlines 100-foot buffer option with utility-fee credits after mapping 66 affected parcels
Summary
City staff presented mapping showing 66 parcels affected by a proposed 100-foot no-disturb buffer along city rivers and proposed a special-protection area offering utility-fee reductions (15%–45%) to incentivize expanded buffers; staff suggested voluntary credits could begin administratively.
A City of Columbia staff member (Speaker 6) presented follow-up work on a requested 100-foot no-disturb buffer around the Lower Saluda, Broad and Congaree rivers within city limits, telling the HSEA committee that mapping identified 66 parcels subject to the proposed buffer and 29 distinct property owners — with state agencies and the City of Columbia among the largest owners.
"What we have determined from the mapping... that there are 66 parcels affected," the staff member said, noting that some parcels already lie within a floodway and were excluded from the count. The staff member described an alternative the city is considering: a special protection area that would expand the existing 50-foot ordinance buffer to 100 feet by granting a 15% stormwater utility-fee reduction to participating properties.
Staff also described a deeper incentive tier: where owners increase a buffer to 150 feet (an additional 100 feet beyond the current 50-foot requirement), they could receive up to a 45% utility-fee reduction. City staff said the incentives would apply to city parcels where buffers are applicable and that staff had coordinated mapping and regional comparisons.
Committee members discussed regional standards: a county staffer (identified in discussion as Bill) said Lexington County mandates a 100-foot perennial-stream buffer while Richland County requires 50 feet. Committee members and staff debated whether incentives or mandates are the better tool; one staff speaker argued the city could begin issuing credits administratively on a voluntary basis "essentially effective today" while public outreach and further owner-specific work proceed.
City staff emphasized this is an incentive-based alternative the city would present as a potential path forward; no ordinance change or binding action was adopted at the meeting. Staff framed the approach as a way to protect water quality while offering property owners a financial incentive that could lower monthly stormwater utility bills, and they noted coordination with Richland County would be needed for regional alignment.
The committee asked staff to continue outreach and to provide more precise property-owner lists and outreach plans before any ordinance change.
