Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Calendar topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Panel backs bill favoring five-day school week while grandfathering districts already on four-day schedules

House Education Committee · April 23, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Bill 82, which would limit new four-day school week conversions and grandfather existing four-day districts, passed the House Education Committee after debate about child nutrition, teacher recruitment and local control. Sponsor and supporters cited student meals and workforce signals; opponents warned the bill overrides local calendars.

Senate Bill 82, sponsored by Senator Mizell, was reported favorably April 23 by the House Education Committee after a lengthy debate over whether districts should be allowed to adopt a four-day school week. The bill would generally preserve a five-day instructional week statewide, grandfather existing four-day districts and permit new conversions only for districts that already hold an A performance rating.

Senator Mizell argued that a five-day calendar preserves access to school meals, avoids potential harms to instruction and removes an obstacle to economic development. "If there is no school open on Friday, very many of those kids have nothing to eat," Mizell said, noting child-poverty concerns.

Supporters from some rural districts and district leaders described four-day schedules as an important recruitment and retention tool for teachers and said planned off-day programs can provide meals and wraparound services; several East Feliciana officials described optional Monday programs that would offer meals and academic supports. Opponents said the bill removes local control over calendars and imposes one-size-fits-all policy on districts operating under differing local realities.

Committee members were divided but ultimately supported a motion to report the bill favorably; the clerk announced the motion carried (10 yeas, 3 nays). The legislation now proceeds toward subsequent floor consideration.

Votes at a glance: committee recorded roll call reporting SB82 favorably (10 yeas, 3 nays).