Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development Tif topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Marion council approves North Commercial TIF amendments, hires consultant to study Marion East TIF for housing
Summary
The Marion City Council unanimously approved three ordinances amending the Marion North Commercial TIF, authorized a professional-services agreement to study the proposed Marion East TIF for a roughly 30–35 acre housing project that would require a sewer extension and lift station, approved multiple TIF grant applications, and adopted a resolution committing the city's share of an ITEP-funded Crab Orchard Greenway project.
Get email alerts on the Economic Development Tif topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Marion City Council on May 22 approved a package of tax-increment financing (TIF) measures affecting the North Commercial TIF, agreed to hire a consultant to study a proposed Marion East TIF tied to a 30–35 acre housing proposal, approved a slate of TIF grant applications, and adopted a resolution to commit the city's share of an ITEP-funded trail project.
On a series of roll-call votes the council approved Ordinances 4044, 4045 and 4046, which amend the city's TIF maps and change the redevelopment project area for the Marion North Commercial TIF district. City staff described the three ordinances as the standard sequential set used to amend an existing TIF and said the changes update official maps to remove and add parcels.
Cody, the city staff member who presented the Marion East proposal, said the developer's plan focuses "mainly [on] single-family homes" on a roughly 30–35 acre tract on the east edge of town north of Route 13, but that the site requires substantial infrastructure including a lift station and about a 2,200-foot sewer extension to make the project buildable under city services and zoning. "With the county's ordinances, one-acre lots don't pencil out on this 30-acre tract," Cody said, explaining that TIF could help finance the infrastructure needed to support higher density within city limits.
The council also moved to hire Jacob McLean and the economic development group to study whether the Marion East site qualifies for a TIF and to administer the district if established (Ordinance 4047). Cody said establishing a new TIF was likely cheaper than amending an existing residential TIF because the latter would require certified mailings to roughly 3,200 parcels, increasing costs.
The meeting record shows each ordinance and the professional services agreement passed by roll-call votes with affirmative responses from the mayor and commissioners present.
Votes at a glance
- Ordinance 4043: Approve sale of three seized police vehicles (authorized; bids received; individual bid amounts for two vehicles recorded in staff remarks).
- Ordinance 4044: Approve third amendment to the redevelopment agreement plan and projects for the Marion North Commercial TIF District (approved by roll call).
- Ordinance 4045: Designate amended redevelopment project area for the Marion North Commercial TIF District (approved by roll call).
- Ordinance 4046: Adopt tax increment allocation financing for the Marion North Commercial TIF District third amendment (approved by roll call).
- Ordinance 4047: Approve a professional services agreement with Jacob McLean and the economic development group to study and administer the proposed Marion East TIF (approved by roll call).
- TIF grant applications: Approved a list of applications totaling $357,000 in project costs with $175,000 in grant amounts (approved by roll call).
- Resolution 202025-09: Adopt city commitment ($269,188) to the Crab Orchard Greenway ITEP-funded trail project (total project cost cited by staff at approximately $2,691,000) (approved by roll call).
Why it matters: The package advances redevelopment planning and infrastructure investment tools. The Marion East proposal, if qualified for TIF and developed, would extend sewer and water service into an edge-of-city tract and could enable a mix of mostly single-family housing with limited multifamily units; it also raises questions about infrastructure costs, annexation/contiguity and how TIF benefits will be shared with nearby residential TIF areas.
What to watch next: The hired consultant will study qualification for a Marion East TIF and return recommendations; formal establishment of a new TIF, if pursued, would require statutory steps, certified mailings (if amending an existing residential TIF), and additional public hearings.

