Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Detention Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chair Siegfried presents bill to bar state deals that give financial incentives to private detention operators
Summary
House Substitute No.2 for House Bill 151 would prohibit state and local governments from entering agreements that provide per‑diem, subsidies or other financial incentives to private entities for detention facility operation, while exempting residential alternatives and certain juvenile facilities.
Sen. Ray Siegfried presented House Substitute No.2 for House Bill 151, arguing the state should retain control of detention facilities and not rely on private companies whose incentives, he said, can conflict with public accountability.
Siegfried told the committee that a few private companies manage detention facilities nationally and earn "about $4,000,000,000 a year," and he said privately run facilities tend to show higher staff turnover and worse outcomes in areas such as violence and staff safety compared with state‑run facilities. "House substitute number 2 for house bill 151 prohibits the state, a unit of local government or any agencies... from engaging in any of the following activities with respect to detention facilities," Siegfried said, describing a wide prohibition on financial incentives, per‑diem or management contracts with private entities.
The bill exempts certain facilities, including residential alternatives for detention and non‑secure juvenile facilities under Family Court jurisdiction, and focuses on preserving public oversight of detention operations. The committee opened public comment and recorded no registered speakers on HB151 during this hearing.
After discussion, the meeting proceeded to approve minutes and adjourn; no committee vote on HB151 was recorded at this session.
