Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Alachua County Commission approves rezoning for 5‑acre Jonesville parcel after neighbors object
Summary
The Board approved a request to rezone a 5‑acre Jonesville parcel from lower‑density RE1 to R1A (up to 4 units/acre), which could allow up to 20 single‑family homes; neighbors raised concerns about drainage, wildlife and historic family farms but staff said the application met comprehensive‑plan criteria.
The Alachua County Board of County Commissioners voted to approve rezoning application Z25‑000028 for a 5‑acre parcel on Southwest 143rd Street near Jonesville, changing the property from RE1 (0.5–2 dwelling units per acre) to R1A (1–4 units per acre), a staff report said. County staff told the board the change would allow as many as 20 single‑family homes on the site under the existing future‑land‑use designation.
Growth Management senior planner Mayde Bangatar presented the staff analysis, saying the parcel lies inside the county's urban cluster, is on a county‑maintained road and that environmental review found the rezoning consistent with natural‑resource protections. "This area already has R1A zoning in the surrounding parcels," staff said in remarks to the board.
Applicant Eric Taylor told commissioners the property has been family‑owned since 2006 and that the family intends to pursue rezoning as a next step; he said no site plan has yet been prepared. "We purchased the property with the intent to buy and hold," Taylor said, adding he has tried to engage neighbors.
Neighbors who were granted party status at the quasi‑judicial hearing urged caution. Barbara Henry, whose family has farmed adjacent land for decades, said she feared increased traffic, damage to wildlife habitat and changes to drainage patterns. "You can't drive through a house," Henry said, arguing that a secondary road referenced in public materials is no longer passable and that animals and farm operations would be affected.
Riley Douglas Fisher, another nearby landowner and farm operator, asked that any future work place drainage infrastructure on the western portion of the parcel to avoid altering runoff toward longstanding agricultural land. "If it stays as is, you don't upset anything," he said.
Commissioners and staff reviewed access and infrastructure. Planning staff said a project at the scale enabled by the rezoning (20 units maximum on 5 acres) would not require a second access under county standards; the property's frontage on SW 143rd Street would suffice for the number of units anticipated. The staff report cited relevant standards in the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 7.10.2, Policy 3.4.1) and the Unified Land Development Code (Sec. 402.77 and Table 403.07.01).
Chair (speaker 1) acknowledged the history of Black family land loss in the county while explaining the legal standard commissioners must follow. "I wish that I did see a basis for denial," the chair said, noting the property lies within the urban cluster and the request conforms to the plan. The commission approved the rezoning on a voice vote with the bases listed in the staff report.
Commissioners urged the applicant and future developers to be good neighbors in site design, to minimize grading near adjoining farms and to address drainage and wildlife concerns as detailed engineering plans are prepared. The board also encouraged staff to follow up on neighbors' questions about a neighborhood meeting presentation and circulation of materials.
What happens next: The rezoning takes effect according to county procedures and any future subdivision or site plan would be reviewed through the county permitting process, including stormwater and access requirements.
