Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get AI Briefings, Transcripts & Alerts on Local & National Government Meetings — Forever.

Votes at a glance: April 27 Katy City Council — contracts, budget amendment, appointment

City of Katy City Council · April 27, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved several contract awards (landscape improvements, ERP procurement, sewer and storm projects), authorized bond counsel, approved a budget amendment, and appointed a new finance director; consent agenda and listed resolutions passed during the meeting.

At the April 27 council meeting the City of Katy approved a series of routine but substantive items under consent and resolutions:

- Awarded a contract to JCT Landscape Maintenance and Irrigation Corp. for 3B Learning Center amenity improvements (bid $315,722.24; total project cost $340,472.24). Funding: general fund reserves.

- Approved a master services agreement with Univerus Inc. for a new ERP system, including one‑time implementation and first‑year costs totaling $833,712.50.

- Authorized an engagement addendum with Plante & Moran PLLC for ERP implementation advisory services.

- Awarded contracts to Vortex Services LLC for sanitary sewer rehabilitation ($414,856 bid; total project cost $525,539) and for Heritage Drive storm sewer relining (phase 1 & 2) (bid $447,280; total project cost $539,464). Projects include contingency and engineering costs as noted by staff.

- Approved a bond‑counsel agreement with Allen Boone Humphreys Robinson LLP (ABHR) for the Texas Water Development loan related to wastewater treatment expansion (bond counsel fees up to $286,000; source: bond proceeds).

- Adopted Amendment No. 6 to the FY25/26 budget to account for general fund reserve usage tied to earlier approvals.

- Appointed LeeAnne Carindong as finance director effective May 4, 2026.

Most items were approved on voice vote or by motion and second; several councilmembers participated in brief clarifying comments but none of these consent/resolution items provoked sustained debate compared with zoning items.