Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Nursing Home Quality topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee pauses nursing‑home remediation bill after wide testimony; sponsors and advocates agree to work on changes
Summary
Senate Bill 405 would require remediation plans for CMS 1‑star nursing homes and allow LDH to monitor progress and impose sanctions after two years. The committee did not move the bill and asked stakeholders to negotiate measurement, workforce and targeting details.
Senate Bill 405, introduced by Senator Talbot, would require nursing homes that receive a 1‑star overall rating from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to submit remediation plans to the Louisiana Department of Health within 30 days and to provide quarterly progress reports; if quality does not improve after two years, LDH could impose sanctions up to placing a facility on a closure track.
Former LDH Secretary Kathy Kliever and AARP representatives urged action, citing poor Louisiana nursing‑home quality rankings, frequent immediate‑jeopardy citations and high rates of bed sores and hospital admissions from nursing homes. They argued accountability and remediation processes are needed to protect residents.
Industry witnesses, including Wes Hathaway of the Louisiana Nursing Home Association, urged caution: they said the CMS 5‑star tool is a consumer information system and was not designed as an enforcement trigger; they described measurement quirks (survey scoring, staffing comparisons to national benchmarks) and workforce constraints that affect ratings. Hathaway walked the committee through how CMS computes stars and warned that a sizable share of facilities would fall into the 1‑star category under current scoring.
Senators asked for targeted approaches (for example, focusing on corporate operators with repeated failures) and for refinement to avoid penalizing facilities with legitimate contextual factors. Committee leadership asked the sponsor and stakeholders to work on agreed measurement and targeting language before bringing it back; the bill was left in committee for revision.
