Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Increment Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Redevelopment director and financial advisor outline TIF revenues, bonds and shortfalls
Summary
Terre Haute's redevelopment director and financial advisor presented the Redevelopment Commission's April report, detailing 2025 TIF revenues, outstanding bond repayments and two TIF areas that underperformed projections and include developer guarantees to cover shortfalls.
Get email alerts on the Tax Increment Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jordan Marvel, the city's executive director of redevelopment, introduced the Redevelopment Commission's April 15 financial report and said it fulfills a statutory presentation requirement for the council.
Jason Semler, the redevelopment commission's financial advisor, walked council members through 2025 figures for each tax-increment-financing (TIF) area, explaining how assessed-value growth is captured to fund infrastructure and incentives. "When you create a TIF area ... the taxes generated from that new development is what's captured by the redevelopment commission," Semler said, summarizing the mechanics for members.
Semler identified two TIF areas where tax increments came in below projections and explained the financing safeguards: developers in those areas either guaranteed the bonds or provided coverage clauses so the city would not be left short if revenues fell short. He also reviewed outstanding bond series tied to projects such as the Cherry Street multimodal facility and a downtown incentive for a hotel, noting maturities and principal-and-interest owed as of January 1, 2025.
Council members asked about an apparent discrepancy showing employee expenditures even though the redevelopment commission has no payroll; Semler said staff in the redevelopment office perform work on commission projects and some payroll costs can be allocated to TIF-funded projects. He also explained that the downtown hotel not yet being built contributed to a debt-service appearance that made expenditures exceed current revenues in the downtown (CBD) allocation area.
Marvel and Semler closed by saying the report is primarily historical (reporting 2025 activity) and offered to answer follow-up questions from council members.
The presentation did not include a council vote; it was received as the required annual report and will remain part of the commission's record.

