Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Innovation Fund topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nevada County CCP votes to raise innovation fund cap to $200,000 and broaden eligibility
Summary
The Community Corrections Partnership voted by voice to increase the innovation fund cap to $200,000 and allow applicants beyond local community-based organizations, and agreed to add a review process and subcommittee to score proposals.
Get email alerts on the Innovation Fund topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chair (S3) opened discussion of the CCP’s local innovation fund, summarizing staff’s estimate that the fund balance could approach $200,000 by the end of the fiscal year and noting changes to the funding request form.
Committee members debated whether the fund should remain limited to Nevada County community-based organizations serving justice-involved populations or be opened to government agencies and other entities. Several members argued that an innovation fund should support one-year pilot projects that are evaluated before being added to the ongoing CCP budget. One member raised a practical concern that a $40,000 cap would be too small to seed many government-led pilots, saying, “I would like to take the cap off” (Committee member S6).
After further discussion about statutory carve-outs and budget mechanics, Committee member S6 moved to increase the maximum available for the innovation fund to $200,000 and to broaden eligible applicants beyond only community-based organizations. Chair (S3) called for a second, then conducted a voice vote; the Chair stated the motion carried.
The committee discussed the application schedule that staff had drafted — applications due May 15, notice May 22, funding period July 1–June 30 — and agreed to add more time for review. Members asked for a subcommittee or scoring panel to evaluate proposals and for a final interview/presentation step before awards are made.
The Chair and staff said this change does not obligate the committee to spend the full $200,000 immediately; all proposals will still return to the CCP for approval. No roll-call vote or individual tallies were recorded in the transcript; the motion was carried by voice.
Next steps the CCP agreed on included revising the application language to reflect the broader eligibility, creating a scoring process and convening a small panel to evaluate submissions before full-committee action.

