Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter Vacancy Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Study Commission adopts charter language keeping interim appointees until next municipal election, after debate
Summary
The Bozeman Study Commission voted 3–1 on Feb. 18 to propose a charter amendment that would require interim appointments to serve until the next regularly scheduled municipal election, adding public-forum requirements and extending the appointment window to give applicants and voters more time to weigh choices.
The Bozeman Study Commission voted 3–1 on Feb. 18 to adopt proposed charter language that would have the city commission appoint interim replacements who would serve until the next regularly scheduled municipal election.
The vote followed a lengthy discussion about whether vacancies should instead be filled by special elections. Commissioner Barb moved to adopt “Option A,” which keeps appointments in place until the next municipal election but requires a public forum for potential applicants and extends the current 30‑day appointment window to give the public more time to review candidates; Commissioner Becky seconded. Commissioner Deanna cast the lone dissent.
Why it matters: several residents and commissioners said the current appointment process can give appointees an incumbency advantage and reduce public participation. Supporters of the amendment said the changes increase transparency and public input without running into legal and logistical barriers to calling special elections.
Greg Sullivan, Bozeman City Attorney, told the commission that state law creates a distinction between what a charter may prescribe about filling vacancies and what statutes governing election procedures allow. Sullivan said the city attorney’s office can ask the Montana Attorney General for a formal opinion but cautioned that a formal request requires substantial legal work and that AG opinions are binding until overturned by a court.
Eric Semerad, Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder and Election Administrator, and Jasmine Hall, Gallatin County election manager, told commissioners that Montana law and election logistics constrain short‑notice special elections. They explained that candidate filing windows, list‑maintenance work and equipment testing make ad hoc special elections difficult and that municipal primaries and general elections provide predictable times for holding contests.
Several residents addressed the commission during public comment. James Stilts urged moving toward special elections or stronger voter involvement rather than appointments. Roger Blank urged the commission to pursue the Attorney General’s guidance if there is any chance special elections are permitted. Jason Delmue said the existing appointment process can produce well‑qualified candidates who can step in quickly.
What the amendment does and what remains unclear: the adopted language emphasizes a public forum and a 60‑day appointment window (rather than the current 30 days) and states the appointee will serve until the next municipal election; commissioners discussed but did not adopt additional limits such as barring appointees from running in the ensuing election. The commission decided not to request an AG opinion (a separate motion to seek one failed for lack of a second).
Next steps: commissioners will finalize charter and ballot language as part of a broader schedule that includes a May 7 legal review, public hearings in mid‑June, a draft report in July and approval of ballot language by July 30 so the county can receive ballot wording by the August 10 deadline.
